Design team settles on unique preferred alternative for new school

At yesterday afternoon’s meeting of the School Design Advisory Team (SDAT), BLRB Architects presented three variations on previously presented designs, plus one entirely new one. Under the new design, the building would be mainly on the north half of the site, but in two distinct parts–one on the upper level and one on the lower level. These would be connected by enclosed bridges and would keep the building from feeling as spread out as under some of the other alternatives.

In addition, the play areas (grassy field, asphalt play area, and covered play area) would be located on the SW corner of the site (upper level) and the staff parking would be moved to the lower field area. This would make the corner of 51st Ave. SW and SW Genesee St. more attractive than if it had a parking lot, and would make supervision and access to and from the play areas easier for staff and students.

To see a site plan and mock-ups of the design from various angles, please visit the West Seattle Blog. Tracy Record attended the Community Conversation last night and did a nice write-up. I am adding a few more details below.

All of the alternatives presented to SDAT yesterday involved reducing the height difference between the upper and lower areas by moving several feet of soil from the upper area to all or part of the lower area. Because the lower area is smaller, moving a few feet of soil from up above translates into a greater depth at the lower field. The increased elevation of the lower field will create a downward slope between at least some of the lower field and the easement and adjoining properties to the east.

One advantage of the preferred alternative is that it would not carve into the hillsides and would therefore be less expensive. In addition, the hillside with all the trees would be preserved (which is something GSNC has been pushing for).

Property owners to the east may be glad to know that the building must be at least 30-35′ from the property line to allow for emergency vehicle access. In addition, the architects talked about mitigating both sound concerns and views of the building and parking lot with additional plantings near the property line. The parking lot is also likely to be moved as far toward the forested slope as possible.

The SDAT consensus was that the new design is the preferred alternative, which means that the architects will move forward with fine-tuning it rather than develop further alternatives. The design was also well-received by community members who attended the Seattle Public Schools’ Community Conversation event later in the evening.

If you have comments on this design, please do share them with us here.

Posted in Information | Tagged , , , | 1 Comment

Supporters Wanted for Parks Levy Meeting on Wednesday, January 23!

On Wednesday, January 23, we invite neighborhood residents (including families) to come to South Shore Middle School (4800 South Henderson Street, Seattle, WA 98118) from 6-9 p.m., to show your support of our proposals to the Parks Opportunity Levy Oversight Committee. Our proposals are for funds to support: (1) play area and open space enhancements at the Genesee Hill site, and (2) acquisition of the grassy parcel at 48th Ave. SW and SW Charlestown St. to preserve green space.

The first 45 minutes of the above time slot will be an “open house” format where all competing parks proposals will have tables set up with displays about their proposed projects. Each group will then have the opportunity to make a presentation for 3 minutes (sign-ups for a slot will occur upon check-in; therefore, we do not yet know the time of our presentation). Please let us know if you can attend any part of the Wednesday evening meeting!

Enhancements at the Genesee Hill site would be above and beyond the district-funded items that would be provided as part of the new school construction: basic playground for ages 5-12, grassy field, and asphalt play area. Our proposed enhancements would include a playground for ages 2 and up, natural play areas (dirt, rocks, logs), fitness zones, educational native plant and/or rain garden, small amphitheater, meandering walking path/track, bench seating, welcoming entries with art, and more. (If funded by the parks opportunity levy, these enhancements could occur even if the school capital levy does not pass in February.)

We are coordinating this proposal with the school district, Schmitz Park School leadership, and the Hiawatha before-and-after school program that is currently housed at Schmitz Park School, to improve our chances of getting the parks funding. Because the school itself is still under design, the exact location of play area and open space enhancements on the site is yet to be determined.

Thanks,

Kerrie Schurr
Communications Chair
and GSNC Rep. to SDAT

Posted in Event | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Next GSNC meeting to be held on January 10

Curious how plans are shaping up for the new elementary school on the Genesee Hill site?

Please come to our next general meeting, where we will have a presentation on the initial conceptual design and a progress update by BLRB Architects.

The meeting details are as follows:

When: Thursday, January 10, at 7 p.m.

Where: Schmitz Park Elementary School, 5000 SW Spokane Street

We look forward to seeing you!

Posted in Event | Tagged , , | Leave a comment

Initial School Design Concepts from Dec. 15 Design Advisory Team Meeting

On Dec. 15 (which happened to be the day after the Newtown, CT, school tragedy), the School Design Advisory Team (SDAT) met to explore possible layouts for the new elementary school to be built on the Genesee Hill site. A variety of possibilities were explored, and the design was narrowed down to one for the architects to further explore and assess from a feasibility and cost standpoint.

Here is a summary of what was included in this design (apologies that it is a text description, but no drawings or plans are currently available):

- The building itself would be located mainly on the upside down L-shaped upper area of the site (as viewed from SW Genesee St.; i.e., the levels where the current bldg. and portables are located). It is possible that some classrooms would “step down” one or both of the slopes to the lower field; this would be more expensive upfront but could result in heating savings later.

- The preferred design would have half the classrooms where the southernmost portables are now, overlooking or partially stepping down the slope; these would be connected to a central core area at the corner of the L to include the library–optimally located for the view of Rainier–and administrative offices. The long leg of the L (on the western part of the site) would include more classrooms (again either on top of the slope or partially stepping down it) and the gym/multipurpose/performance and Hiawatha spaces.

- The building’s elements would include an office/administrative area (preferred to be located where it will see all visitors entering the main entrance off of SW Dakota St.), 6 clusters of classrooms, with 4 classrooms, restrooms, and other shared spaces in each cluster. There would also be a library, gym, multipurpose room (cafeteria), occupational/speech/physical therapy spaces, and a smaller performance space. In addition, there would be space for the Hiawatha before-and-after school child care program to operate, custodial spaces, etc. The design team dealt only with the major spaces, not the more minor ones, and even then, the architectural team will have to make the final call.

- The large trees on the site are currently being assessed as to their location and condition; obviously, any buildings on the slopes would necessitate removal of trees and also native plants on the west side. It is important to school staff to have visibility through the site for safety purposes. The design advisory team members were split with regard to keeping the trees, with some folks (such as GSNC) in favor of keeping them, and others not at all concerned if they were cut.

- Parent/general parking would likely be onsite along the SW Dakota St. side, and staff parking would be located near the corner of 51st and Genesee; bus dropoff and loading would be along 51st Ave. SW. There would also need to be a service drive, perhaps off of SW Dakota St. There are very few access points on the property where the street level and the site level match, which makes this a challenge.

- The main play areas would be located at the NE corner of the lower field, nestled below the building, with a switchbacked ramp from the building down to the field. There would be a smaller asphalt area (perhaps 1/4 to 1/3 of the overall area), with the remainder left in grass. The school would also like to have a small vegetable garden for the students. In addition, there would be a covered play area of some kind, and a covered outdoor learning area/pavilion.

- There would be stairs added at the NE and SW corners of the grassy field to the upper level; these could be used as people come and go from the site. (There would be no public passthrough at the corner of the L.)

- There would be an entrance gate, perhaps with art, at the SE corner of the property. This would allow community access across the site to the NE stairs and SW Dakota St. during nonschool hours; GSNC is working with the district in hopes of getting some assurance that this access will be protected.

Remember that none of this is set in stone, though major changes to the general layout are probably unlikely. The architectural team continues to take comments even during the holidays, so we welcome your feedback to our e-mail address and will pass it on to them.

The public will have an opportunity to comment on a more finalized version of this plan during the week of Jan. 22-25 when the architects will be available daily during school hours at Schmitz Park School. There will also be a public meeting around that time (date to be announced).

In addition, GSNC is working with the district and the architects to finalize the date of the next GSNC meeting when the architects can present their vision for the new design (with cost and feasibility taken into account). We will let you know as soon as we have more information on this meeting.

Posted in Information | Tagged , , , | Leave a comment

Summary of “A Single Goal” Responses for New School

Remember when we asked, “If you could have only one goal for the new school, what would it be…”? Below is a compilation of the thoughtful responses we received, which were used as the basis for our continued input to the district and design advisory team. We sincerely thank all of you who were able to take the time to respond.

From Lilith Lysistrata:
I’d like to put my vote in for this as a single goal:

The new school at Genesee Hill should be an asset to the entire community: students, neighbors, and the city.

Underlying this single goal is that it should be an environment that inspires students to learn, a building that fits into the neighborhood (physically, as well as with the values of the community), and provides a space that will strengthen our community for years to come.

From Holly McCracken:
I would say a primary goal for the school, from the perspective of adjacent neighbors, would be:
-          Maintain as much of the natural habitat as possible.  We have seen bald eagles nest in the trees surrounding the school buildings, and would really love to see them incorporated into the design.  Similar to college campuses – like the University of California at Santa Cruz.

From Kevin Gemeroy:
Given the lack of open park space in the neighborhood (Schmitz Park itself being the exception but still lacking “open space”), I think the priority should be grounds that can effectively double as a public park.

Play fields, play equipment for kids, and some sort of a community gathering area would be great.  It would be nice to see Seattle schools build a 2 or 3 story building so as to leave at least 50% + of the lot as “open space”.

A dedicated drop off area for parents and buses which was not on Genesee would also be nice.  51st would be preferable.  It would be safer for the kids and would prevent backups on the arterial.

From Terri Goodwin:
I think community/pedestrian access to grounds and buildings is a priority. Perhaps stating it as such would imply good flow and park-like grounds.

Personally, I am also concerned about parking and traffic with a school that size (up to 600?).

From Bill Higbee:
As for my number one-goal for the new school, I will say:
Fosters a positive learning environment

If that is implied in their efforts and they want an answer from an aesthetics perspective, then I’ll say:
Park Like Grounds

From Daniel Vinci:
Environmentally friendly / highest LEED standard – to be used / incorporated in a manner that it is inclusive as an educational tool.

From Tony Giaquinta:
A decent multi-faceted sports field. There are not enough in our neighborhood,  somewhere for these kids to be active and for the school to develop a top level physical education program. It should include a track as well as provision for soccer and baseball.

Posted in Information | Tagged , | Leave a comment

December 13 meeting to focus on new elementary school at Genesee Hill site

Are you wanting to learn more about the current status of the design process for the new school and to have a chance to comment? Then please join us at this week’s meeting, where we will have a presentation by BLRB Architects, followed by the opportunity to express your interests and thoughts about the new school and its surrounding site. This will be the last chance for input on the location of the building on the site and other key design considerations prior to the design advisory team’s meeting on Saturday, December 15.

Seattle School District project manager Janet Donelson and Schmitz Park principal Gerrit Kischner are also expected to join us, along with a few members of the design advisory team.

The meeting details are as follows:

When: Thursday, December 13, at 7 p.m.

Where: West Seattle High School Library (at the northwest corner of the building, which is the one closest to PCC and McDonald’s).

We look forward to seeing you!

Posted in Event | Tagged , | Leave a comment

Some design parameters and ideas for new school

More details for tonight’s meeting:

The district is planning a multistory building that will serve from 500 to 650 students and meet district guidelines for elementary schools, but the specifics of what it will look like, what it will contain, and where it will be located on the site are all up for discussion.

To get your creative juices flowing, below are links to the sites of some schools that the design advisory team toured recently; please come to the meeting to share your feedback, or e-mail us at gsncouncil@gmail.com with your comments.

Helen Keller (Lake Washington School District):

http://www.lwsd.org/school/keller/About-Us/Pages/NewBuilding.aspx

(Scroll down to lower images. Aerial photo at top shows both the new and the old buildings, and the old one has since been demolished and a sand athletic field installed.)

Riverview (Snohomish School District):

http://riverview.sno.wednet.edu/

http://www.cefpi.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=4284

(Scroll down to see the video on the second link.)

Sherwood Forest (Bellevue School District):

http://www.bsd405.org/schools/elementary/sherwood-forest.aspx

and another that a member of the advisory team shared (but the team did not tour):

Robert Frost Elementary School (Lake Washington School District):

http://www.studioms.com/portfolio/k-12-education/robert-frost-elementary-school

Aside | Posted on by | Tagged , , , , , , , | Leave a comment